Oppenheimer (2023) plot flowchart — contains full spoilers
Oppenheimer (2023) — movie details
Home
Theme
i
Wikipedia contributors, Oppenheimer (film)
·
CC BY-SA 4.0
. Plot adapted into a flowchart. Contains full spoilers.
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Causes The account explicitly presents the preceding caution as prompting this change in conduct.
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Causes The disproved premise is given as the reason for the change in research direction.
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Reveals The later discussion expressly brings this earlier conduct into the security case.
Reveals The later discussion expressly brings this earlier conduct into the security case.
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Reveals The flashback undercuts Strauss’s account by showing Oppenheimer did not mention him in that conversation.
Story progression
Causes Strauss’s frustration is explicitly attributed to this policy disagreement.
Story progression
Story progression
Causes The account identifies Strauss’s accumulated irritation as his motive for initiating the hearing.
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Story progression
Reveals The testimony overturns the expected alignment and exposes Strauss’s personal vendetta.
Story progression
Story progression
Setup
Studies physics in Europe
Before his teaching career, Oppenheimer studies theoretical physics in Europe.
Action
Teaches in California
In the 1930s, Oppenheimer teaches at Caltech and the University of California, Berkeley.
Setup
Communist ties at Berkeley
Some Berkeley academics are Communist Party members, but Oppenheimer does not join the party.
Setup
World War II begins
serious danger
World War II breaks out.
Communication
Lawrence warns Oppenheimer
Ernest Lawrence cautions Oppenheimer against maintaining communist connections.
Decision
Scales back connections
After Lawrence's warning, Oppenheimer scales back his connections.
Communication
Groves recruits Oppenheimer
General Leslie Groves approaches Oppenheimer to lead the Manhattan Project.
Plan
Proposes Los Alamos lab
serious danger
Oppenheimer proposes a new laboratory at Los Alamos where they can try to build an atomic bomb before the Nazis.
Action
Teller joins Los Alamos
Edward Teller is recruited to Los Alamos.
Setup
Teller raises ignition theory
serious danger
Teller theorizes that an explosion could ignite the global atmosphere.
Revelation
Atmospheric theory disproved
serious danger
Teller's theory that an explosion could ignite the atmosphere is disproved.
Decision
Teller turns to fusion
serious danger
Teller begins researching fusion-based weapons instead of working on the proposed fission bombs.
Action
Oppenheimer gains clearance
Oppenheimer gains his security clearance in 1942.
Relationship
Rekindles Tatlock affair
Immediately after gaining clearance, Oppenheimer rekindles his affair with his Communist ex-lover, Jean Tatlock.
Deception
Lies to protect Chevalier
serious danger
Oppenheimer protects Haakon Chevalier from an espionage investigation by directly lying to security officer Boris Pash.
Action
Trinity test succeeds
serious danger
In July 1945, the U.S. Army successfully conducts Trinity, the first detonation of a nuclear weapon.
Action
Bombs strike Japan
serious danger
The United States detonates atomic bombs over Hiroshima and Nagasaki, concluding World War II.
Communication
Oppenheimer expresses remorse
In the immediate aftermath, Oppenheimer tells President Truman that he feels remorse for building the bomb.
Communication
Truman dismisses remorse
Truman absolves Oppenheimer of responsibility but is annoyed by his remorse.
Setup
Named father of the bomb
Oppenheimer is labeled the father of the atomic bomb.
Transformation
Opposes nuclear proliferation
serious danger
In the postwar years, Oppenheimer's public stance shifts toward nuclear non-proliferation.
Communication
Einstein conversation revisited
memory · serious danger
In their 1947 conversation, Oppenheimer tells Einstein that the global catastrophe they feared and believed averted is now inevitable; a flashback at the 1963 award reveals that Oppenheimer never mentioned Strauss.
Action
Soviet Union tests plutonium bomb
serious danger
In 1949, the Soviet Union successfully tests a plutonium bomb similar to one developed at Los Alamos.
Conflict
Oppenheimer favors arms talks
serious danger
At a meeting of top advisors, Oppenheimer favors arms talks with Russia over escalating with Teller's proposed thermonuclear weapons.
Conflict
Strauss grows frustrated
Oppenheimer's position frustrates AEC chairman Strauss, who is irritated at being constantly undermined by him.
Communication
Past security lapses resurface
serious danger
During a heated discussion, Oppenheimer's past security lapses are brought up, including his affair with Tatlock and his lie to Pash.
Plan
Strauss conspires with Borden
serious danger
In 1954, irritated at Oppenheimer's repeated opposition, Strauss conspires with Borden to initiate a security clearance hearing.
Decision
Strauss appoints Robb
serious danger
Strauss appoints Roger Robb as counsel for Oppenheimer's hearing.
Communication
Robb repeats disloyalty accusations
serious danger
As counsel, Robb replays accusations that Oppenheimer is disloyal to the United States.
Communication
Groves testifies for Oppenheimer
serious danger
Groves testifies in favor of Oppenheimer at the security hearing.
Communication
Rabi testifies for Oppenheimer
serious danger
Isidor Rabi testifies in favor of Oppenheimer.
Communication
Kitty testifies for her husband
serious danger
Kitty Oppenheimer testifies in favor of her husband.
Communication
Teller testifies against Oppenheimer
serious danger
Teller testifies against Oppenheimer at the hearing.
Communication
Borden testifies against Oppenheimer
serious danger
William Borden testifies against Oppenheimer at the hearing.
Loss
Q clearance is revoked
serious danger
The three judges revoke Oppenheimer's Q clearance by a two-to-one decision, ending his government advisory role.
Setup
Strauss nominated for Commerce
In 1959, Strauss is nominated as U.S. Secretary of Commerce, and the Senate is expected to confirm him by tradition.
Communication
Senate questions Strauss
At his confirmation hearing, Strauss is questioned about his actions concerning Oppenheimer's security hearing.
Communication
Strauss cites FBI suspicions
Strauss alleges that the FBI was suspicious of Oppenheimer since his teaching days, well before Borden accused him of espionage in 1954.
Communication
Strauss denies acting against him
Strauss claims he did not act against Oppenheimer through the security hearing, despite their many public disagreements.
Communication
Strauss blames Oppenheimer
Strauss alleges that Oppenheimer turned scientists against him, beginning with Einstein at Princeton in 1947.
Communication
Teller testifies for Strauss
Teller testifies in favor of Strauss at the Senate hearing.
Setup
Hill expected to testify
Physicist David L. Hill is expected to follow Teller in support of Strauss.
Communication
Hill exposes Strauss's vendetta
Instead, Hill exposes Strauss's personal vendetta and says the scientific community is against him.
Resolution
Senate rejects Strauss
The Senate rejects Strauss's nomination.
Aftermath
Oppenheimer receives Fermi Award
In 1963, Oppenheimer receives the Enrico Fermi Award.
×