Oppenheimer (2023) plot flowchart — contains full spoilers

Story progressionStory progressionStory progressionStory progressionCauses The account explicitly presents the preceding caution as prompting this change in conduct.Story progressionStory progressionStory progressionStory progressionStory progressionCauses The disproved premise is given as the reason for the change in research direction.Story progressionStory progressionStory progressionReveals The later discussion expressly brings this earlier conduct into the security case.Reveals The later discussion expressly brings this earlier conduct into the security case.Story progressionStory progressionStory progressionStory progressionStory progressionStory progressionStory progressionReveals The flashback undercuts Strauss’s account by showing Oppenheimer did not mention him in that conversation.Story progressionCauses Strauss’s frustration is explicitly attributed to this policy disagreement.Story progressionStory progressionCauses The account identifies Strauss’s accumulated irritation as his motive for initiating the hearing.Story progressionStory progressionStory progressionStory progressionStory progressionStory progressionStory progressionStory progressionStory progressionStory progressionStory progressionStory progressionStory progressionStory progressionStory progressionStory progressionStory progressionStory progressionStory progressionStory progressionReveals The testimony overturns the expected alignment and exposes Strauss’s personal vendetta.Story progressionStory progression